Donald Trump Gives Powerful Interview To New York Times, Refuses To Commit To NATO

Before I turned in for the night yesterday, the big story that had just started trending involved an interview of Donald Trump by two New York Times Jews, David E. Sanger and Maggie Haberman, in which The Don denounced NATO and previous commitments made to defend the obsolete group.

Kikes across the tubes had begun screeching in horror once word emerged that even if Russia decided to invade Eastern Europe, something that would be glorious if highly unlikely, Trump would refuse to interfere if the costs outweighed the benefits.

From New York Times:

Donald J. Trump, on the eve of accepting the Republican nomination for president, explicitly raised new questions on Wednesday about his commitment to automatically defending NATO allies if they are attacked, saying he would first look at their contributions to the alliance.

Asked about Russia’s threatening activities, which have unnerved the small Baltic States that are among the more recent entrants into NATO, Mr. Trump said that if Russia attacked them, he would decide whether to come to their aid only after reviewing if those nations “have fulfilled their obligations to us.”

“If they fulfill their obligations to us,” he added, “the answer is yes.”

Mr. Trump’s statement appeared to be the first time that a major candidate for president had suggested conditioning the United States’ defense of its major allies. It was consistent, however, with his previous threat to withdraw American forces from Europe and Asia if those allies fail to pay more for American protection.

This is extremely interesting, considering the fact that the current administration, at the behest of the Jews, has spent the last several years attempting to incite a war with Russia in order to defend multiculturalism, faggotry, and mass immigration into the Western World.

Mr. Trump also said he would not pressure Turkey or other authoritarian allies about conducting purges of their political adversaries or cracking down on civil liberties. The United States, he said, has to “fix our own mess” before trying to alter the behavior of other nations.

“I don’t think we have a right to lecture,” Mr. Trump said in a wide-ranging interview in his suite in a downtown hotel here, while keeping an eye on television broadcasts from the Republican National Convention. “Look at what is happening in our country,” he said. “How are we going to lecture when people are shooting policemen in cold blood?”

The fact remains that much of our power structure is utterly cucked from the top to the bottom, with subhuman animals allowed to operate with impunity inside our own borders.

Until we respond with ruthless force, yes I support military deployed onto the streets to crush Black terrorists, there is no reason why we need to whine and complain to other countries about issues that are their own personal business.

In fact, if we are so devoted to the cause of “civil and human rights,” why do we not scold nations such as Germany, Sweden, and France for laws barring freedom of speech?

Oh wait.

That would be because of the Jews.

“This is not 40 years ago,” Mr. Trump said, rejecting comparisons of his approaches to law-and-order issues and global affairs to Richard Nixon’s. Reiterating his threat to pull back United States troops deployed around the world, he said, “We are spending a fortune on military in order to lose $800 billion,” citing what he called America’s trade losses. “That doesn’t sound very smart to me.”

Mr. Trump repeatedly defined American global interests almost purely in economic terms. Its roles as a peacekeeper, as a provider of a nuclear deterrent against adversaries like North Korea, as an advocate of human rights and as a guarantor of allies’ borders were each quickly reduced to questions of economic benefit to the United States.

…

“If we decide we have to defend the United States, we can always deploy” from American soil, Mr. Trump said, “and it will be a lot less expensive.”

The age of Neo-Conservatism is now dead. No longer will American boys bleed to death in a faraway land to protect the interests and serve the whims of an elite of traitors who by and large have been Jewish Communists hiding behind the veneer of “Democracy.”

We now live in an era of American Nationalism that will serve our people first above all others, and will not involve the nation in adventures meant to destabilize whole regions of the globe.

Mr. Trump had nothing but praise for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the country’s increasingly authoritarian but democratically elected leader. “I give great credit to him for being able to turn that around,” Mr. Trump said of the coup attempt on Friday night. “Some people say that it was staged, you know that,” he said. “I don’t think so.”

Asked if Mr. Erdogan was exploiting the coup attempt to purge his political enemies, Mr. Trump did not call for the Turkish leader to observe the rule of law, or Western standards of justice. “When the world sees how bad the United States is and we start talking about civil liberties, I don’t think we are a very good messenger,” he said.

While I disagree with the literal interpretation of Trump’s statement, a more careful analysis indicates that he either understands only a bit of the nuances of the Turk coup, and respects Erdogan for brutalizing journalists, army officers, professors, and judges seen as subversive traitors, or he is merely trolling the media by getting the message of a fake coup out without looking like a tinfoil conspiracy theorist.

Not a big deal anyway, as the Turks will see that Trump is not a man to mess with if they value their lives and possessions.

He said he had consulted two former Republican secretaries of state, James A. Baker III and Henry Kissinger, saying he had gained “a lot of knowledge,” but did not describe any new ideas about national security that they had encouraged him to explore.

Mr. Trump emphatically underscored his willingness to drop out of Nafta unless Mexico and Canada agreed to negotiate new terms that would discourage American companies from moving manufacturing out of the United States. “I would pull out of Nafta in a split second,” he said.

He talked of funding a major military buildup, starting with a modernization of America’s nuclear arsenal. “We have a lot of obsolete weapons,” he said. “We have nuclear that we don’t even know if it works.”

And there you have it. Glorious Leader cannot be swayed by outside influences, and will bring jobs back to America by scrapping the love-child of the economic Kikes of the 1990’s.

We are in an age of decisive change, Brothers, and it’s only forward from here on out.

And nobody will stand in our way.